> and on an on topic note, am I the only one here that would
> have LOVED to see lillymon flame the shit out of danoz?
For what? Posting his beliefs in a thread that asked him what his beliefs were? Can't the man have a belief system without being attacked at every single turn? I don't believe how much shit everyone gives him all the time. He never replies to the exact same posts made by the atheists/agnostics/satanists on the board with flames or preaching. I don't see why everyone else feels it necessary to reply to his post and flame him and preach about their beliefs and why his are wrong.
> and on an on topic note, am I the only one here that would
> have LOVED to see lillymon flame the shit out of danoz?
Am I the only one who would LOVE to see bmecoli banned again ? See bro, it's useless to say things like that. The fact that you don't agree with someone dosen't means you don't have to show him some respect. Especially when talking about HIS beliefs.
> Can't the man have a belief system
> without being attacked at every single turn?
I don't know, can't some of us believe that Bush isn't the second coming of Christ without getting yelled at by Danoz and accused of being liberals and/or fascists (depending on his mood)?
> > Can't the man have a belief system
> > without being attacked at every single turn?
> I don't know, can't some of us believe that Bush isn't the
> second coming of Christ without getting yelled at by Danoz
> and accused of being liberals and/or fascists (depending on
> his mood)?
I said that to show you that what you said wasn't needed. Give the guy a break he don't troll, he just have a different point of view. And that wasn't troll, ''and on an on topic note, am I the only one here that would have LOVED to see lillymon flame the shit out of danoz?'' THAT was trolling. Dude, just think before you speak.
> someone should make him a backroom moderator. Let's see how
> much shit people give him then.
But that wouldn't really SOLVE anything. The way you phrase that sentence makes it scream POWER ABUSE, POWER ABUSE! <img src=smilies/upeyes.gif> Authority does not make one great, to paraphrase Yoda. It almost sounds like you're hoping he'd ban those who have different opinions, or just who voice something other than what he wants...admittedly I've had my issues with the guy in the past, but I don't think he'd want that let alone actually do that.
> I didn't mean that people would have to fear him due to
> power abuse.. I meant that people would think twice before
> breaking rules just to attack him.
Think about it though...isn't that really the same thing in several ways?
