> Individuals have certainly sued the United States before,
> but they usually name somebody (the attorney general has
> been sued)... they would still call it "individual vs the
> United States". I'm almost positive the case (if even
> heard) would go the US Court of Federal Claims. I'm still
> learning this mass bank of information
.
Yeah, I realize that there are many "People vs...." cases, and probaby xxx vs. US somewhere, but moreover, in an international court accusing the United States of war crimes? That's ballsy to me b/c its never been done, and they'd be essentially trying to take down the institittion of "fair war" that we claim to the world. If the U.S. (namely George W.) were convicted of war crimes in an internatinoal court.....what would happen? You know damn well he wouldn't stand for it, and wouldn't face a sentencing. The U.S. would literally be left with the world looking at us like a thug that's been convicted of murder, but refuses to take his sentencing b/c he's holding a thermal detonator.
I don't really know if I had a point with this thread...maybe just to arouse speculation about "what if" he were convicted. Eh, let the thread die if you want....it was kinda dumb to begin with.
<P ID="signature"><div align="center">
...the way to be!</div></P>