Zophar's Message Domain

Go Back   Zophar's Message Domain > General Chat > Talk of the Town

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2008, 07:32 AM   #1
JadussD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,100
Default You know, it's too bad you can't vote for who runs the media

I mean, seriously, what is this "Presidental candidate" thing; I want to vote for who runs the media! Fuck all this governmental bullshit, it's the corporations that run everything.

Seriously, forget the President; I want to vote for the guys who get to collect billions while shitting down the necks of the general populace. I want to vote for the guy who gets to shove the absolute lowest common denominator down the throats of the population and then hire some talking head to complain about it. I want to elect the guy who gets to put himself above both sides of an argument and make people think they have to pick one side or the other. I want to vote for the master of illusion, the guy who gets to make up all the stock arguments people pick up on talk radio and regurgitate ad nauseum. I want to vote for the guy who can make people give a shit about Paris Hilton or a Seroquel-addled Britney Spears shaving her head. I want to vote for them dammit!

Last edited by Reaper man; 08-12-2008 at 08:09 AM. Reason: I think these posts can merge together :)
JadussD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2008, 03:30 PM   #2
mushroom blue
Regular Member
 
mushroom blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JadussD View Post
I mean, seriously, what is this "Presidental candidate" thing; I want to vote for who runs the media! Fuck all this governmental bullshit, it's the corporations that run everything.

Seriously, forget the President; I want to vote for the guys who get to collect billions while shitting down the necks of the general populace. I want to vote for the guy who gets to shove the absolute lowest common denominator down the throats of the population and then hire some talking head to complain about it. I want to elect the guy who gets to put himself above both sides of an argument and make people think they have to pick one side or the other. I want to vote for the master of illusion, the guy who gets to make up all the stock arguments people pick up on talk radio and regurgitate ad nauseum. I want to vote for the guy who can make people give a shit about Paris Hilton or a Seroquel-addled Britney Spears shaving her head. I want to vote for them dammit!
voting for the media is what most people are already doing anyway; we have at least five viable political parties, but only two are given attention. internationally, you hear about the other parties as much as Americans hear about the Canadian NDP, which is to say maybe once every five to ten years. but every country on earth has talked about whether americans are going to vote Obama or not (McCain universally scares everyone). they don't know that there are other people running.

where do they get their news from, mainly? well, most countries pull their U.S. stories either directly from Associated Press or Reuters, or their story is based on whatever the two sources have reported as true.

but I don't want to vote for the person who makes america give a shit about mundane celebrities. it's bad enough that we have people in office that think they can control us; I don't want ones that can demonstrably do it repeatedly.

Last edited by mushroom blue; 08-12-2008 at 03:38 PM.
mushroom blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 06:02 AM   #3
D--
Senior Member
 
D--'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chaoyang, Beijing, China
Posts: 826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JadussD View Post
I mean, seriously, what is this "Presidental candidate" thing; I want to vote for who runs the media! Fuck all this governmental bullshit, it's the corporations that run everything.

Seriously, forget the President; I want to vote for the guys who get to collect billions while shitting down the necks of the general populace. I want to vote for the guy who gets to shove the absolute lowest common denominator down the throats of the population and then hire some talking head to complain about it.
Want to vote for the media? Want to control what we report?

Since I work in media and have for five years, I'll give you a secret ... IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, DON'T FUCKING READ/WATCH IT!

If people were not so fucking glued to the set over stories of celebrity divorce, Britney going bonkers, Terry Schiavo, Cheney's hunting accident, the Edison Chen sex photo scandal or any of the other pointless fucking stories of the last few years, we would not cover these!

The only person you have to blame is yourself for showing us that this is the news you want!

We try and cover a town hall meeting. We try and cover changes in local government. We try to cover pollution in your nearby river. What do you do? You yawn, go to sleep and change the channel to Wheel of Fortune. Is it any wonder that America is ripping the middle east the fuck apart and declaring all kinds of people to be terrorists, but no one even knows the difference between Suni and Shia Islam aside from "one is associated with the evildoers"?

I watch stories go across the desk or come in from the wire all the time. They are simplified to oblivion for you lazy lard buckets. The history behind the event is completely omitted because you have shown us that you do not have the attention span to digest it.

I would LOVE to make every story a history lesson. I would LOVE for people to fully grasp the connections that make it important. But that doesn't fit into the bubble of your 6:00 action news hour.

Media is a business. We sell news. To stay in business, we have to find ways to package it where you will consume it like crack. News conglomerates blow billions of dollars studying what you like.

The verdict is in: you love the Doritos of news.

The cheesy, oily shit that is incredibly bad for you and keeps you too full, fat and fucking tired to ingest anything healthy that you actually need.

Sure, you can go on and on about how each conglomerate has its own political leanings. Fine. But you know what? If you guys actually wanted news about Ralph Nader, Bob Barr or Cynthia McKinney, we would be packaging and selling that. But you don't give a fuck what they have to say. You have shown us that already, and we report and cover accordingly.

Do you have any idea how hard it is to put together a story about a "mundane" topic in a way where you take anything away from it? If you are a good and lucky reporter, you might be allowed 300 words. Three hundred words is not much unless you are reporting in fucking haiku.

A Wednesday meeting,
Man spoke about a tax hike,
And no one liked it.

I can't tell you how many times I was told by a superior, "There is no way we are going to run 600 words about [blank]." So what goes away? The background. The context. My painstaking research to make sure you, the reader, understand why raising those extra animals is causing desertification and why that will ruin the new paint job on all the homes in the city and carry dirt all over with the prevailing winds. That shit is stripped down to one or two sentences that, more often than not, are dumbed down, distorted and fail to convey the gravity or a topic.

Good job consumers. Since no one is buying news, we have to sell more ads and sack more reporters. Ads take up page space -- space where news stories cannot go. And the more people get their news from the Internet and drop their subscriptions, the less advertisers are willing to pay. Media is scrambling to find a way to survive when no one is paying for it. You can call it an outdated business model, but that doesn't change the fact that someone has to find a solution or your news will continue to suffer and dwindle.

It's a fantastic race to the bottom, and I can't wait to see what happens when we get there.

In the mean time, you have no one to blame but yourself that only Obama and McCain are given air time and paper commentary. You know there are actually laws mandating equal air time made available for presidential candidates -- I wonder why these laws never apply to third party candidates, who are year after year forcibly barred by police from entering the debates?
__________________
portfolio :: deviantArt :: 微博 :: Twitter

Last edited by D--; 10-22-2008 at 06:28 AM.
D-- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2008, 07:38 AM   #4
Gil-Galad
Senior Member
 
Gil-Galad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 658
Default

People only really love meaningless conversational filler, bling and explosions for the most part.
Gil-Galad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2008, 12:53 AM   #5
Rattlehead
Senior Member
 
Rattlehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hell...or Arkansas.
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D-BOY View Post
Want to vote for the media? Want to control what we report?

Since I work in media and have for five years, I'll give you a secret ... IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, DON'T FUCKING READ/WATCH IT!

If people were not so fucking glued to the set over stories of celebrity divorce, Britney going bonkers, Terry Schiavo, Cheney's hunting accident, the Edison Chen sex photo scandal or any of the other pointless fucking stories of the last few years, we would not cover these!

The only person you have to blame is yourself for showing us that this is the news you want!

We try and cover a town hall meeting. We try and cover changes in local government. We try to cover pollution in your nearby river. What do you do? You yawn, go to sleep and change the channel to Wheel of Fortune. Is it any wonder that America is ripping the middle east the fuck apart and declaring all kinds of people to be terrorists, but no one even knows the difference between Suni and Shia Islam aside from "one is associated with the evildoers"?

I watch stories go across the desk or come in from the wire all the time. They are simplified to oblivion for you lazy lard buckets. The history behind the event is completely omitted because you have shown us that you do not have the attention span to digest it.

I would LOVE to make every story a history lesson. I would LOVE for people to fully grasp the connections that make it important. But that doesn't fit into the bubble of your 6:00 action news hour.

Media is a business. We sell news. To stay in business, we have to find ways to package it where you will consume it like crack. News conglomerates blow billions of dollars studying what you like.

The verdict is in: you love the Doritos of news.

The cheesy, oily shit that is incredibly bad for you and keeps you too full, fat and fucking tired to ingest anything healthy that you actually need.

Sure, you can go on and on about how each conglomerate has its own political leanings. Fine. But you know what? If you guys actually wanted news about Ralph Nader, Bob Barr or Cynthia McKinney, we would be packaging and selling that. But you don't give a fuck what they have to say. You have shown us that already, and we report and cover accordingly.

Do you have any idea how hard it is to put together a story about a "mundane" topic in a way where you take anything away from it? If you are a good and lucky reporter, you might be allowed 300 words. Three hundred words is not much unless you are reporting in fucking haiku.

A Wednesday meeting,
Man spoke about a tax hike,
And no one liked it.

I can't tell you how many times I was told by a superior, "There is no way we are going to run 600 words about [blank]." So what goes away? The background. The context. My painstaking research to make sure you, the reader, understand why raising those extra animals is causing desertification and why that will ruin the new paint job on all the homes in the city and carry dirt all over with the prevailing winds. That shit is stripped down to one or two sentences that, more often than not, are dumbed down, distorted and fail to convey the gravity or a topic.

Good job consumers. Since no one is buying news, we have to sell more ads and sack more reporters. Ads take up page space -- space where news stories cannot go. And the more people get their news from the Internet and drop their subscriptions, the less advertisers are willing to pay. Media is scrambling to find a way to survive when no one is paying for it. You can call it an outdated business model, but that doesn't change the fact that someone has to find a solution or your news will continue to suffer and dwindle.

It's a fantastic race to the bottom, and I can't wait to see what happens when we get there.

In the mean time, you have no one to blame but yourself that only Obama and McCain are given air time and paper commentary. You know there are actually laws mandating equal air time made available for presidential candidates -- I wonder why these laws never apply to third party candidates, who are year after year forcibly barred by police from entering the debates?

Wow. Finally, someone who shares my views on our shitty, attention span-lacking society, yay! Seriously, dude...couldn't have put it better myself. Pure awesomeness.
__________________
Killing is my business...and business is good!


Click here to level up my card!

Rattlehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM.

Contact Us - Zophar's Domain - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.