Zophar's Message Domain

Go Back   Zophar's Message Domain > General Chat > Talk of the Town

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2009, 10:12 PM   #61
FleshCage
Senior Member
 
FleshCage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 175
Default

a lot of females in nature are larger than the males??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism


Wait. I found this while searching for the animals. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/di...ls-themselves/
__________________

This is the internet. No one exists past your computer screen.
FleshCage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 11:59 PM   #62
Iconoclast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 278
Default

You folks don't joke do you?

Not only could my post have been interpreted more accurately but now a source this one links to, giving evidence that either gender can statistically (or naturally) have more weight than the other (depending on the species), which is more than what I was saying.

It seems civility does not stop humans from being savages, in their perceptions. If anything it does the opposite.

While we've switched to this topic, I'm following that I respect people for their differences. I don't really value others when I see things that we have in common. In a nature that can be related, I also don't care about the supposedly "statistical" or "psychological" analysis of "this gender is naturally smarter than that gender" or "thinks less about this subject than the other".
I believe in sympathy.
Iconoclast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 04:37 AM   #63
FleshCage
Senior Member
 
FleshCage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 175
Default

Come again? It's apparent you don't joke either.

Are you referring to my post?
If you click on the first link, and you scroll down, you'll notice the portion about humans. Although more specific, I thought it was relevant to the spun off topic of the thread.

The second link, I found to be really weird, and figured someone would get a kick out of it. that one was a joke.

Again, if this is directed towards me, and I'm just throwing this out there, you don't have to be touchy.
__________________

This is the internet. No one exists past your computer screen.

Last edited by FleshCage; 10-18-2009 at 04:52 AM.
FleshCage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 04:12 PM   #64
Iconoclast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FleshCage View Post
a lot of females in nature are larger than the males??
No, you need to learn to interpret people's posts accurately.
Iconoclast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 06:11 PM   #65
FleshCage
Senior Member
 
FleshCage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 175
Default

Yup. Maybe I do. Maybe I'm just a big fucking flaming retard? Yay! Someone was bound to fucking say it.
Too bad they're just words, and no one can understand the context in which they're being used, unless heard from the person's mouth.

This is ridiculous. I'm out.
__________________

This is the internet. No one exists past your computer screen.
FleshCage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 07:02 PM   #66
Iconoclast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 278
Default

Know how the lightning that comes from the sky, strikes down below?
I mean tornadoes were already referred to as "God's judgments", but wouldn't it be awesome, is if the lightning was rainbow-colored?

So that perception was bound by many rainbows , openly expressing itself as a systematic matrix?
Iconoclast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 07:06 PM   #67
FleshCage
Senior Member
 
FleshCage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 175
Default

What about the negative charges that go up? Are they the absence of light since the ones going down are rainbows?
__________________

This is the internet. No one exists past your computer screen.
FleshCage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2009, 11:25 PM   #68
Reaper man
Member
 
Reaper man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FleshCage View Post
This is ridiculous. I'm out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleshCage View Post
What about the negative charges that go up? Are they the absence of light since the ones going down are rainbows?
wat.
__________________
Reaper man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2009, 07:21 AM   #69
FleshCage
Senior Member
 
FleshCage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 175
Default


Ah, it's silliness.
__________________

This is the internet. No one exists past your computer screen.
FleshCage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2009, 04:06 AM   #70
Iconoclast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 278
Default

Yeah well kids I guess that would be what they call a "fucking question", but while we're focused on light, rainbows are no mystery. Through a process named refraction, light energy can be split into its components and even form a rainbow.
Charge is a concept applied to matter in question of which components of light (i.e. red, green, blue) are absorbed or reflected.

We see the colors in an object when they are being reflected, but darker or black objects are warmer than bright or white objects because these components are absorbed so that we do not see them.

But you don't want too many rainbows coming down on you cause uh that would mean somebody up there likes you. Can't have that now can we.
Iconoclast is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Contact Us - Zophar's Domain - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.