Zophar's Message Domain

Go Back   Zophar's Message Domain > General Chat > Talk of the Town

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2004, 11:10 PM   #1
Turtle
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 52
Default Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

The reason I hear most often cited for why someone opposes legalizing gay marriage is that "marriage between a man and a woman is a union blessed by God" and that allowing homosexual to marriage is "an affront to God." So does this mean that you also oppose marriage between non-Christian heterosexuals,?

<P ID="signature"></P>
Turtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2004, 11:50 PM   #2
MooglyGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 4,014
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

> So does this
> mean that you also oppose marriage between non-Christian
> heterosexuals,?

Of course they don't. This is because they are hypocrites.

<P ID="signature">
"Kupo, motherfucker!! DO YOU SPEAK IT!?"</P>
MooglyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 01:07 AM   #3
Danoz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,903
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

It isn't a religious reasoning, but an attempt to protect us from both radical Judges who find themselves above the law, and the abolishing of traditional marriage (which is, by definition, the union of a man and a woman). Frankly, we just want those desiring homosexual marriage to go about getting it the right way-- and hopefully, to find a common ground involving a fair civil partnership of appropriate recognition and benefits.

<P ID="signature"></P>
Danoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 01:44 AM   #4
Mr. Saturn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 986
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

> Frankly, we
> just want those desiring homosexual marriage to go about
> getting it the right way-- and hopefully, to find a common
> ground involving a fair civil partnership of appropriate
> recognition and benefits.

You know what would be really fair? For the government to reject future marriages, remove the benefits for it, and enforce only civil unions, with benefits. That way conservatives have their marriage, and homosexuals get to be mar-Oops. I mean civil-unioned.

<P ID="signature"><marquee direction=right scrollamount=14><img src=http://gifs.bestgraph.com/jeux-video/sonic/sonic-02.gif></marquee></P>
Mr. Saturn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 01:51 AM   #5
Ugly Joe
Senior Member
 
Ugly Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,461
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

> You know what would be really fair? For the government to
> reject future marriages, remove the benefits for it, and
> enforce only civil unions, with benefits. That way
> conservatives have their marriage, and homosexuals get to be
> mar-Oops. I mean civil-unioned.

What is so wrong with having two different terms for it? There is clearly a difference between the two, so why not make it explicit? I mean, your post is most likely just a troll at Danoz, but really it could work if a couple could be both married and "civily-unioned".

<P ID="signature"></P>
__________________
Ugly Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 01:55 AM   #6
Mr. Saturn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 986
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

> What is so wrong with having two different terms for it?
> There is clearly a difference between the two, so why not
> make it explicit? I mean, your post is most likely just a
> troll at Danoz, but really it could work if a couple could
> be both married and "civily-unioned".

That's what my ideal position is. The problem is it won't happen. So I have to take more cynical positions.
<img src=smilies/thumb.gif>

<P ID="signature"><marquee direction=right scrollamount=14><img src=http://gifs.bestgraph.com/jeux-video/sonic/sonic-02.gif></marquee></P>
Mr. Saturn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 02:07 AM   #7
Turtle
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

> What is so wrong with having two different terms for it?
> There is clearly a difference between the two, so why not
> make it explicit?

It works all the time in Europe. However, Europe has a few thousand more years experience than North America in being civilized, so you can't blame the US for lagging behind on occasion.

<P ID="signature"></P>
Turtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 02:11 AM   #8
Turtle
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

> traditional marriage (which is, by definition, the union of a man and a woman).

Could you point out to me where this is defined? Is there a particular verse in the Bible that defines marriage or is the definition coming from another source? (Please don't take this as a challenge to the authenticity of your claim, I'm simply curious as to where precisely such is defined, as I don't recall having seen this before.)

<P ID="signature"></P>
Turtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 02:39 AM   #9
WhyteKnight
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 775
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

> (which is, by definition, the union of a man and a woman).

Um. In the approximately 2 minutes I spent researching this, I found that the definitions of the words marriage, wedlock, and matrimony are more commonly explained as a union "between two people" or "any close union" as opposed to "between a man and a woman." example:
"Syn: Matrimony; wedlock; wedding; nuptials.
Usage: {Marriage}, {Matrimony}, {Wedlock}. Marriage is
properly the act which unites the two parties, and
matrimony the state into which they enter. Marriage
is, however, often used for the state as well as the
act. Wedlock is the old Anglo-Saxon term for
matrimony."
Webster's revised only mentions "man and woman" one time in their definition. The Oxford English Dictionary, the definitive authority on the English language, never did specify marriage as being between a man and a woman.

<P ID="signature"><center><a href=http://faith.rydia.net/></a></center></P>
WhyteKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 02:57 AM   #10
Danoz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,903
Default Re: Question for Christians who Oppose Gay Marriage

Where do you get this mesh? How do you think those marriages were overturned at all? The first definition of marriage, the word, has been as follows; "The legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife." This isn't even open for debate. The institution is thousands of years old and it has historically, always been defined as a union between a man and a woman. It's clear you ignored the first line.

Then where is the argument? Definitions change. In this case, added to-- let's continue down the list.
"A union between two persons having the customary but usually not the legal force of marriage: a same-sex marriage."
Easy enough, right? No. We're talking about intent now, and it's obvious that at the writing of the word was for the definition accepted at the date of writing.

If marriage is to be allowed between same sex couples, it should be amended to the constitution and clarified. This is where I stand.

<P ID="signature"></P>
Danoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:51 AM.

Contact Us - Zophar's Domain - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.