Zophar's Message Domain

Go Back   Zophar's Message Domain > General Chat > Talk of the Town

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2009, 12:57 AM   #41
Maximum Potion
Staff (news - ROM hacking/translations)
 
Maximum Potion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Châteauguay, Québec, Canada
Posts: 625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InVerse View Post
And last I knew, firearms were not originally designed to kill people, unless you're one of those PETA fucks that can't tell the difference between a deer and a human.
Do you have facts with which to back this up? I would be interested in seeing them.
__________________
Metroid: Other M. June 27th, 2010.
Delayed - August 31st, 2010.
Maximum Potion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 07:42 PM   #42
Burzy
Awesome Member
 
Burzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada eh
Posts: 211
Default

Guns don't kill people..

I KILL PEOPLE :O

hehe
Burzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 01:27 AM   #43
The 9th Sage
Senior Member
 
The 9th Sage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NY State in the US
Posts: 17,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burzy View Post
Guns don't kill people..

I KILL PEOPLE :O

hehe
__________________
Just can't wait to bomb some Dodongos.
---
http://www.xanga.com/zeldadd

Twitter
The 9th Sage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 03:59 AM   #44
jdev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 144
Default

I love UHF.

Also, firearms (strictly speaking, guns refer to artillery) are weapons modified from artillery, such as cannons, to be fired by handheld or portable means (although, technically, the cannons were developed from fire-lances, which were a sort of proto-firearm attached a spear). This was done in order to create a more portable weapon, more capable of penetrating armor than than the bow and arrow or a sling. Now, to be fair, a great deal of technology prior to the invention of civil engineering was developed primarily for military purposes, but given the history of firearms, how could one even argue that their military use didn't play a part in their development and design?

Also, why is it that so many gun people think that if you aren't as crazy for guns as they are, then you're automatically against guns? I was actually making the argument that the manufacturer of a product shouldn't be held liable for the use of their product by a consumer, even if the action is inherently consistent with the intended use of that product. And killing people is consistent with the design of a firearm, and we've substantially improved our ability to kill efficiently with those weapons. Repeating shots isn't necessary for hunting, most game will run away after the first shot, if you miss, and if you're hunting something that doesn't run away after the first shot, wasting a shot will probably get you killed (and, of course, hunting big game wouldn't be fun without the threat of getting trampled by an elephant or eaten by a bear). A semi-automatic or automatic weapon is really only useful when your "game" shoots back.
jdev is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:23 AM.

Contact Us - Zophar's Domain - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.