Which Nintendo 64 emulator is better for me?

Sephirstein

New member
I assume that PJ64 and 1964 are so far ahead of the competition that the other emulators mean jack shit...

But my specs are as follows...

AMD Athlon 2500+ (Barton Core)
512 MB PC-2100 DDR-RAM (Will replace with PC-2700 soon.)
Very overclockable (God Bless MSI!) GeForce 4 Ti-4200 /w 64 MB of RAM.
SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS
Windows XP Pro

And I don't think the rest matters. :)


<P ID="signature"></P>
 

CEpeep

New member
PJ64 and 1964 each work better with different games. PJ64 is easier to configure, but sometimes 1964 is faster. Try 'em both and see which you like better.


<P ID="signature">--------------------

peepos.gif


[19:28] KaOSoFt: why do you even use FF?
[19:28] KaOSoFt: it takes double RAM than IE</P>
 

Sephirstein

New member
> PJ64 and 1964 each work better with different games. PJ64
> is easier to configure, but sometimes 1964 is faster. Try
> 'em both and see which you like better.

Thanks...I'll try 'em both...It's nice to have a videocard to can run emulators other than UltraHLE (which I've gotten to play Mario 64 at 60 FPS with a Voodoo1 and a P1-233 MMX...I know NES emulators that are not even that fast nowadays.)...lol

<P ID="signature"></P>
 
Top Bottom