PDA

View Full Version : Which Nintendo 64 emulator is better for me?


Sephirstein
12-12-2004, 06:27 PM
I assume that PJ64 and 1964 are so far ahead of the competition that the other emulators mean jack shit...

But my specs are as follows...

AMD Athlon 2500+ (Barton Core)
512 MB PC-2100 DDR-RAM (Will replace with PC-2700 soon.)
Very overclockable (God Bless MSI!) GeForce 4 Ti-4200 /w 64 MB of RAM.
SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS
Windows XP Pro

And I don't think the rest matters. :-)


<P ID="signature"></P>

CEpeep
12-12-2004, 06:56 PM
PJ64 and 1964 each work better with different games. PJ64 is easier to configure, but sometimes 1964 is faster. Try 'em both and see which you like better.


<P ID="signature">--------------------

http://www.glastheim.com/images/peepos.gif

[19:28] KaOSoFt: why do you even use FF?
[19:28] KaOSoFt: it takes double RAM than IE</P>

Sephirstein
12-19-2004, 06:42 PM
> PJ64 and 1964 each work better with different games. PJ64
> is easier to configure, but sometimes 1964 is faster. Try
> 'em both and see which you like better.

Thanks...I'll try 'em both...It's nice to have a videocard to can run emulators other than UltraHLE (which I've gotten to play Mario 64 at 60 FPS with a Voodoo1 and a P1-233 MMX...I know NES emulators that are not even that fast nowadays.)...lol

<P ID="signature"></P>