PDA

View Full Version : And now a photo from NJ Governor Jim McGreevy's press conference


RedXIII
08-13-2004, 02:47 AM
"I am a gay American!"

Woah! Just look at the microphone he's using.


Too many pussies whining, so here's a link instead bitches!


<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P><P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by Fla Flash on 08/13/04 07:20 AM.</FONT></P>

Mr. Saturn
08-13-2004, 02:51 AM
Do you ever fucking mark these not safe for work?

<P ID="signature"><marquee direction=right scrollamount=14><img src=http://gifs.bestgraph.com/jeux-video/sonic/sonic-02.gif></marquee></P>

RedXIII
08-13-2004, 02:57 AM
> Do you ever fucking mark these not safe for work?
>

You mean the place where grown ass adults work and that should be able to handle material such as this?

No I don't and wouldn't mark them for that. It's not my place to censor the internet.

I could however mark them, "Please don't click if you're under 18 and mommy or daddy are watching." <img src=smilies/flipa.gif>

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

Mr. Saturn
08-13-2004, 02:59 AM
> No I don't and wouldn't mark them for that. It's not my
> place to censor the internet.

Because putting a warning is censoring.

<img src=smilies/upeyes.gif>

<P ID="signature"><marquee direction=right scrollamount=14><img src=http://gifs.bestgraph.com/jeux-video/sonic/sonic-02.gif></marquee></P>

Ugly Joe
08-13-2004, 02:59 AM
> You mean the place where grown ass adults work and that
> should be able to handle material such as this?
>
> No I don't and wouldn't mark them for that. It's not my
> place to censor the internet.

Erm...that's not the point of NSFW warnings. It's more a matter of your boss looking over your shoulder and seeing a penis on your moniter.

<P ID="signature"></P>

RedXIII
08-13-2004, 03:01 AM
> Erm...that's not the point of NSFW warnings. It's more a
> matter of your boss looking over your shoulder and seeing a
> penis on your moniter.
>

I still don't see where that's my problem. You should be working at work, not jumping on ZD to see what's going on. Get to work slackers. <img src=smilies/flipa.gif>

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

Gokuh
08-13-2004, 03:02 AM
> I could however mark them, "Please don't click if you're
> under 18 and mommy or daddy are watching."

Quit being an asshole and think. The reason why you need to mark them not fit to open for work because he can get fired for viewing pornographic material and/or material that can be viewed as harrasment to certain groups.





<P ID="signature">ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ</P>

RedXIII
08-13-2004, 03:07 AM
> Quit being an asshole and think.

Hey at least I have the option to quit being an asshole. The rest of you I don't know about.

I say again. Work is not a place to surf the internet. It's great for working though. Get your own filtering software and leave me the fuck alone.

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

SpaceTiger
08-13-2004, 03:09 AM
> Do you ever fucking mark these not safe for work?

Yeah, I think this is the sort of thing that should be moderated and enforced in all forums. It's not an issue for me, but I know a lot of people for whom it is.

<P ID="signature">http://qonos.princeton.edu/nbond/tiger5.gif</P>

Turtle
08-13-2004, 03:14 AM
> I still don't see where that's my problem. You should be
> working at work, not jumping on ZD to see what's going on.
> Get to work slackers.

And what if the person is checking the boards during a break?

<P ID="signature"></P>

Gokuh
08-13-2004, 03:16 AM
> I say again. Work is not a place to surf the internet.

I actually agree with you on that. There are other situations where that post would be bad - especially if there were kids in the room.

<P ID="signature">ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ</P>

RedXIII
08-13-2004, 03:20 AM
> And what if the person is checking the boards during a
> break?
>

Here's a better question. I just edited the post 10 minutes ago so why are people still bitchng?

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

Ugly Joe
08-13-2004, 03:26 AM
Okay, all jokes and nsfw links aside, I think he did the right thing.

"Given the circumstances surrounding the affair and its likely impact upon my family and my ability to govern, I have decided the right course of action is to resign,"

Though I'm not entirely sure why he brought it up in the first place.

<P ID="signature"></P>

Turtle
08-13-2004, 03:28 AM
> Here's a better question. I just edited the post 10 minutes
> ago so why are people still bitchng?

Because of your insistance on telling people what they should be doing at work and the fact that you claimed that you only edited the post because you were sick of people complaining, not because you recognized the fact that you were wrong.

<P ID="signature"></P>

Turtle
08-13-2004, 03:33 AM
> Okay, all jokes and nsfw links aside, I think he did the
> right thing.


> "Given the circumstances surrounding the affair and its
> likely impact upon my family and my ability to govern, I
> have decided the right course of action is to resign,"

> Though I'm not entirely sure why he brought it up in the
> first place.

Presuming you mean why McGreevy brought up the homosexual affair, it's probably because it was a more graceful exit than admitting he was resigning due to a sexual harrassment lawsuit from a male employee and unethical fundraising allegations that would likely get him fired anyway.

<P ID="signature"></P>

RedXIII
08-13-2004, 03:36 AM
> fact that you claimed that
> you only edited the post because you were sick of people
> complaining, not because you recognized the fact that you
> were wrong.
>

A fact is not a claim. A fact is a fact and the fact is I did edit the post because people were complaining. However, the fact that I was wrong is not a fact because I didn't really care in the first place and could just as easily just change my post back to it's original form.

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

Turtle
08-13-2004, 03:48 AM
> A fact is not a claim. A fact is a fact and the fact is I
> did edit the post because people were complaining. However,
> the fact that I was wrong is not a fact because I didn't
> really care in the first place and could just as easily just
> change my post back to it's original form.

So, to answer your original question, people are still bitching about it because you're still an asshole.

<P ID="signature"></P>

RedXIII
08-13-2004, 04:19 AM
> So, to answer your original question, people are still
> bitching about it because you're still an asshole.
>

Absolutely. I never debated that I'm not an asshole. I simply stated that I have an option to quit being one.

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

Fla Flash
08-13-2004, 12:21 PM
That's not even close to funny.
Don't repost it.

<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/mean.png>
Diary of a Vigilante III...The Homecoming.. (http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/)</P>

Lillymon
08-13-2004, 12:39 PM
> That's not even close to funny.
> Don't repost it.

What is? What did I miss? Can someone PM me whatever it was?

<P ID="signature"><marquee direction=left scrollamount=8><img src=http://home.graffiti.net/lillymon:graffiti.net/images/keletav.gif></marquee>
!luos ruoy tae lliw stelek ehT</P>

RedXIII
08-13-2004, 03:46 PM
Alright, that's enough. You were already warned about it once.<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by Prower on 08/13/04 10:56 AM.</FONT></P>

SpaceTiger
08-13-2004, 03:50 PM
> Right, but shit like this would be allowed and a laugh riot:

In your childish retort, I notice that you've managed to do exactly the same thing you were warned about...

<P ID="signature">http://qonos.princeton.edu/nbond/tiger5.gif</P>

RedXIII
08-13-2004, 03:53 PM
> In your childish retort, I notice that you've managed to do
> exactly the same thing you were warned about...
>

Did I? Where's the link to the picture that Flash removed?

Hello? I'm still wondering what I was warned about. I was warned by Flash not to repost that link in here again.

If you're talking about Mr. Saturn "warning" me about marking posts NSFW then whatever. Who the hell is he to say shit? If a mod says mark it NSFW then I'll do it.

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P><P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by RedXIII on 08/13/04 11:01 AM.</FONT></P>

Fla Flash
08-13-2004, 06:49 PM
Then in the future do it.

<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/mean.png>
Diary of a Vigilante III...The Homecoming.. (http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/)</P>

MooglyGuy
08-13-2004, 08:00 PM
Looks good, doesn't it?

<P ID="signature">http://www.zophar.net/personal/mooglyguy/new_jersey.gif</P>

Fla Flash
08-13-2004, 08:15 PM
Off subject I wore one around my head one year at a halloween party. Girl asked me if I was a Martian.
I said no, an abortion who lived.
Most of the guys couldn't stop laughing.
Yes, I know it was tasteless.

<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/mean.png>
Diary of a Vigilante III...The Homecoming.. (http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/)</P>

IceWolf20
08-13-2004, 09:18 PM
> Looks good, doesn't it?

I get the rainbow of colors....but what's the crest/seal of?

<P ID="signature"><div align="center">http://stuorgs.lvc.edu/acm/_private/ZMD.gif
...the way to be!</div></P>

Ugly Joe
08-13-2004, 11:02 PM
> I get the rainbow of colors....but what's the crest/seal of?

The state of New Jersey.

<P ID="signature"></P>

blackize
08-13-2004, 11:20 PM
I don't see the big deal. He's gay, he's the governor, get over it.

<P ID="signature"></P>

Danoz
08-14-2004, 12:34 AM
Ugh, he's resigning in 2 months because he wants to deprive the people a fair choice in the next election. Also, there's more to this than just him being gay... he wouldn't need to step down for being gay or cheating on this wife. This is an issue that goes much deeper, and I think we're only now brushing away the first layer of sand.

<P ID="signature">http://www.spazticplastic.com/bannerbaby.gif (http://www.spazticplastic.com)</P>

RedXIII
08-14-2004, 03:42 AM
> Looks good, doesn't it?
>

If you're a homo then I guess it does.

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

RedXIII
08-14-2004, 03:45 AM
> Alright, that's enough. You were already warned about it
> once.
>

I was warned about adult oriented pictures being posted without warning. The only adult oriented picture in that bunch was the one of Bush riding on a penis. What was your problem with the other ones?

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

MooglyGuy
08-14-2004, 06:48 PM
> > Looks good, doesn't it?
>
> If you're a homo then I guess it does.

It's a shame that you can't recognize a modification of your own state flag, but that aside, I thought it's been made abundantly clear I am gay. Do you have something against gays?

RedXIII
08-15-2004, 03:27 AM
> Do you have something against
> gays?
>

Only if they're trying to suck my dick or fuck me up the ass. Other than that, no.

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P><P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by RedXIII on 08/14/04 10:27 PM.</FONT></P>

MooglyGuy
08-15-2004, 04:17 AM
> Only if they're trying to suck my dick or fuck me up the
> ass. Other than that, no.

So I can't suck your dick at MAGfest? <img src=smilies/cry.gif>

<P ID="signature">http://www.zophar.net/personal/mooglyguy/new_jersey.gif</P>

SirDaShadow
08-15-2004, 07:42 PM
> > Only if they're trying to suck my dick or fuck me up the
> > ass. Other than that, no.
> So I can't suck your dick at MAGfest?
>
Oh, I see, so now I know you are a bo...nevermind j/k <img src=smilies/laff.gif>

Staying on topic, I believe he should resign more on the grounds of an "affair". Whether or not it was homosexual or heterosexual should have no bearing whatsoever. Then again, Clinton got away with it (he didn't get impeached)

<P ID="signature"></P>

Fla Flash
08-15-2004, 09:10 PM
Sounds like you're digging for a conspiracy of some sort...or at least a few more rocks to throw at teh Democratz.<img src=smilies/laff.gif>

<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/mean.png>
Diary of a Vigilante III...The Homecoming.. (http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/)</P>

Danoz
08-16-2004, 12:16 AM
This is over a sexual harassment suit in the mist ahead and we all know it. Nobody resigns for being gay or committing adultery. We don't exactly burn people at the stake for being unfaithful in this country. Who cares that he's a "gay American"! Nobody. Although, he COULD have given the people a choice (being a democrat, one who advocates choice consistantly) about a new, necessary special election in November. Of course he'll hold off until then. What a colossal prick.

<P ID="signature">http://www.spazticplastic.com/bannerbaby.gif (http://www.spazticplastic.com)</P>

RedXIII
08-16-2004, 12:16 AM
> So I can't suck your dick at MAGfest?
>

I'm not even gonna be at MAGfest, so the answer is no.

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

Danoz
08-16-2004, 12:17 AM
> Sounds like you're digging for a conspiracy of some
> sort...or at least a few more rocks to throw at teh
> Democratz.

Nah the news has been clear that there's very likely something behind it. Because, I wouldn't call for him to resign on homosexuality or adultery alone.


<P ID="signature">http://www.spazticplastic.com/bannerbaby.gif (http://www.spazticplastic.com)</P>

RedXIII
08-16-2004, 12:24 AM
> I wouldn't call for him to
> resign on homosexuality or adultery alone.
>

But why not? Didn't he decieve the public by doing his little commercials with his wife and kids, trying to play the straight family man role?

It's like Lewinski and Clinton except this is McGreevy and another man. Infidelity is infidelity and this case is no different than that one.

Aside from that he should step down immediately and even be indicted for putting a unqualified non-citizen in a position such as Homeland Security Advisor.

<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

Danoz
08-16-2004, 01:06 AM
<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr>

But why not? Didn't he decieve the public by doing his little commercials with his wife and kids, trying to play the straight family man role?

<hr></blockquote>

Of course, he was just being a good Democrat. <img src=smilies/thumb.gif>

<P ID="signature">http://www.spazticplastic.com/bannerbaby.gif (http://www.spazticplastic.com)</P>

SpaceTiger
08-16-2004, 01:30 AM
> Absolutely. I never debated that I'm not an asshole. I
> simply stated that I have an option to quit being one.

It seems to me that intentionally being an asshole when you can avoid it is much worse.

<P ID="signature">http://qonos.princeton.edu/nbond/tiger5.gif</P>

Danoz
08-16-2004, 01:45 AM
> It seems to me that intentionally being an asshole when you
> can avoid it is much worse.

I dunno, I question the sexuality of any man who posts a picture of a throbbing cock on a forum.


<P ID="signature">http://www.spazticplastic.com/bannerbaby.gif (http://www.spazticplastic.com)</P>

RedXIII
08-16-2004, 02:08 AM
> I dunno, I question the sexuality of any man who posts a
> picture of a throbbing cock on a forum.
>

Even if it was a forum about throbbing cocks?


<P ID="signature">http://home.comcast.net/~owens1970/njhunt.jpg</P>

Gokuh
08-16-2004, 02:20 AM
> This is over a sexual harassment suit

Ive heard that there is more involved here than just that too Apparently some corruption too....... I dont know details, but apparently there are a bunch of corruption investigations going on and his name keeps popping up.

<P ID="signature">ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ</P>

Lobster Cowboy
08-16-2004, 02:21 AM
> I dunno, I question the sexuality of any man who posts a
> picture of a throbbing cock on a forum.

i question the sexuality of any man who uses "throbbing" to describe a photographic penis

<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.lobsterstudios.com/images/lobsterranx.jpg>
</img></P>

Danoz
08-16-2004, 02:47 AM
> > I dunno, I question the sexuality of any man who posts a
> > picture of a throbbing cock on a forum.
>
> i question the sexuality of any man who uses "throbbing" to
> describe a photographic penis

I question the sexuality of anybody who questions the sexuality of any man who uses "throbbing" to describe a photographic penis.


<P ID="signature">http://www.spazticplastic.com/bannerbaby.gif (http://www.spazticplastic.com)</P>

Danoz
08-16-2004, 02:47 AM
> Even if it was a forum about throbbing cocks?

If that's the case, I'm not questioning ;)


<P ID="signature">http://www.spazticplastic.com/bannerbaby.gif (http://www.spazticplastic.com)</P>

SpaceTiger
08-16-2004, 02:52 AM
> I question the sexuality of anybody who questions the
> sexuality of any man who uses "throbbing" to describe a
> photographic penis.

Uh oh, looks like he hit a soft spot... /wwwthreads/images/icons/wink.gif

<P ID="signature">http://qonos.princeton.edu/nbond/tiger5.gif</P>

Octocrook
08-16-2004, 07:02 AM
> Ugh, he's resigning in 2 months because he wants to deprive
> the people a fair choice in the next election. Also, there's
> more to this than just him being gay... he wouldn't need to
> step down for being gay or cheating on this wife. This is an
> issue that goes much deeper, and I think we're only now
brushing away the first layer of sand.

Gee, could it simply be because someone has pictures of him having sex with another man? I mean cmon, let's talk about reality. It's one thing when you have a marriage like the Clinton's and ol' and gets blown by an intern. It's quite another when you keep a secret like that so deeply that you even have a marriage and children to hide it. It becomes a bit more than simply cheating at that point.

<P ID="signature"><center><img src=http://www.crooky.us/z.jpg>
| Music (http://www.domainsfeatured.com>DF</a>) |
"TWELF!" - #4 in Multiplicity</center></P>