View Full Version : the mozillas have landed
Lobster Cowboy
06-18-2004, 05:25 AM
i'm sure most of you are aware, but if not, a whole load of mozillas have landed
you can now get mozilla suite (http://mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/), which is at ver. 1.7. this build will be the new stable, meaning applications built off of mozilla code will use the trunk from this release.
also out is firefox 0.9 (http://mozilla.org/products/firefox/), but BEWARE...some people will experience a bug that causes the browser to crash on load. i got the bug on my desktop, but not my laptop. there's an easy work around, but that kind of bug is inexcusable for a milestone. still a great browser, tho', and it's gonna get even better with 1.0, which is set to hit sometime in september.
finally, you can get your hands on mozilla thunderbird 0.7 (http://mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/), what i believe to be the best mail client around. i switched all the way back with milestone 0.4, and never looked back. this is a great release, and extremely stable.
<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.lobsterstudios.com/images/lobsterranx.jpg>
</img></P>
SwampGas
06-18-2004, 01:36 PM
> also out is firefox 0.9, but BEWARE...some people will
> experience a bug that causes the browser to crash on load.
> i got the bug on my desktop, but not my laptop. there's an
> easy work around, but that kind of bug is inexcusable for a
> milestone. still a great browser, tho', and it's gonna get
> even better with 1.0, which is set to hit sometime in
Another bug is the user agent. Go to Help -> About and actually read it. The graphic says "Firefix version 0.9", but the user agent is "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040614 Firefox/0.8". Nice.
<P ID="signature"><marquee direction=right scrollamount=10>http://www.zophar.net/personal/swampgas/hsrun.gif</marquee></P>
juggaleaux
06-18-2004, 01:42 PM
I'm wondering why instead of overwriting Firefox 0.8, Firefox 0.9 installed itself separately.
Now I have two Firefox's installed. :P
<P ID="signature"><div align=right><a href=http://www.elazulspad.net/j>.</a></div></P>
SirDaShadow
06-18-2004, 03:39 PM
I have to say I tried Firefox and I like it..It renders fast, .the sheer amount of extensions and the so-easy-to-get-em feature really appeals me. I LIVE by mouse gestures, I can't browse wihtout them. Going back and forth pages is so easy without having to go back to the top. That's one of the reasons why I use Slimbrowser. Im considering switching to firefox if I can include all the functionality that SB has into it.
<P ID="signature"></P>
Lobster Cowboy
06-18-2004, 05:16 PM
> Another bug is the user agent. Go to Help -> About and
> actually read it. The graphic says "Firefix version 0.9",
> but the user agent is "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT
> 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040614 Firefox/0.8". Nice.
hmm...mine doesn't say "Firefix" anywhere on the about screen
<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.lobsterstudios.com/images/lobsterranx.jpg>
</img></P>
maq112k2
06-18-2004, 06:51 PM
> also out is firefox 0.9, but BEWARE...some people will
> experience a bug that causes the browser to crash on load.
> i got the bug on my desktop, but not my laptop. there's an
> easy work around, but that kind of bug is inexcusable for a
> milestone.
I had it, and I removed the bug by deleting my old Mozilla Firefox directory, and reinstalling 0.9 -- and the bug in XPCom was gone. I believe the bug I had was that it couldn't over-write the old dll files. Meh.
<P ID="signature"></P>
maq112k2
06-18-2004, 06:52 PM
> considering switching to firefox if I can include all the
> functionality that SB has into it.
Go into the extensions. I'm sure there's a mouse-gesture extension somewhere.
<P ID="signature"></P>
Lobster Cowboy
06-18-2004, 07:35 PM
> I had it, and I removed the bug by deleting my old Mozilla
> Firefox directory, and reinstalling 0.9 -- and the bug in
> XPCom was gone. I believe the bug I had was that it
> couldn't over-write the old dll files. Meh.
what sucked is that i had already done that. whenever i install a milestone, i always make in totally clean, removing old profiles. that's just too bad a bug to have made it to a major release.
thankfully, the developers will have three months to iron out 1.0. i expect that release to be incredible.
speaking of incredible releases, openoffice 2.0 is gonna be super phat. was looking at the roadmap yestereday, and it's gonna blow ms office even further out of the water.
hmm...i just had a thought...why don't the devs of OO use the code of mozilla thunderbird to make a PIM for their suite? it's the one glaring omission from openoffice, and the mozilla mail code is mature enough to be applied to that sort of program.
food for thought
<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.lobsterstudios.com/images/lobsterranx.jpg>
</img></P>
Kuikorosu
06-18-2004, 08:00 PM
Still using Mozilla Firebird 0.7 <img src=smilies/magbiggrin.gif>
<P ID="signature"><hr>
Name: Kuik
Level: 34BLM /20RDM / 15THF / 8WHM / 8SAM/7WAR
Nation: Windurst
Server: Fenrir</P>
maq112k2
06-18-2004, 08:05 PM
> hmm...i just had a thought...why don't the devs of OO use
> the code of mozilla thunderbird to make a PIM for their
> suite? it's the one glaring omission from openoffice, and
> the mozilla mail code is mature enough to be applied to that
> sort of program.
I dunno. I need to download it again. I reformatted and have Office XP installed. Bleh.
<P ID="signature"></P>
CEpeep
06-18-2004, 08:13 PM
> Still using Mozilla Firebird 0.7
>
<img src=smilies/werd.gif>
I haven't used a new version since they changed names to "Firefox." And I won't, until a 1.0 release makes up for its shitty name.
<P ID="signature"><hr>
"Every gun that is made every warship launched every rocket fired signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed those who are cold and are not clothed"
Eisenhower</P>
juggaleaux
06-18-2004, 08:19 PM
> openoffice 2.0
I just creamed in my pants a little. :/
<P ID="signature"><div align=right><a href=http://www.elazulspad.net/j>.</a></div></P>
Crazy_MYKL
06-18-2004, 08:58 PM
> Another bug is the user agent. Go to Help -> About and
> actually read it. The graphic says "Firefix version 0.9",
> but the user agent is "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT
> 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040614 Firefox/0.8". Nice.
>
Sometimes it does that if you don't do a clean install, use about:config to fix it.
<P ID="signature">if ou-yay an-cay ead-ray his-tay, ou-yay ust-jay iolated-vay he-tay DMCA</P>
cipher
06-18-2004, 11:58 PM
> I haven't used a new version since they changed names to
> "Firefox." And I won't, until a 1.0 release makes up for
> its shitty name.
That has to be the single stupidest reason to not use a piece of software I've ever heard.
<P ID="signature">-----
ciphz0r</P>
CEpeep
06-19-2004, 01:08 AM
> That has to be the single stupidest reason to not use a
> piece of software I've ever heard.
>
Would you buy a product in a store called "Steaming pile of fucking shit," regardless of weather or not it was "good?"
<P ID="signature"><hr>
"Every gun that is made every warship launched every rocket fired signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed those who are cold and are not clothed"
Eisenhower</P>
Cornellius
06-19-2004, 02:08 AM
Dude, I agree with Cipher. The name is not important. What's important is the PRODUCT.
<P ID="signature">__________________________________________________ _______________
'' I dreamt I was a moron '' - Squall Leonhart </P>
Fla Flash
06-19-2004, 02:25 AM
Yes. This is why I hired an exterminator.
j/k, btw.<img src=smilies/magbiggrin.gif>
<P ID="signature"><img src=http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/mean.png>
Diary of a Vigilante II....heroes live (http://www.freewebs.com/mewscorner/)</P>
The 9th Sage
06-19-2004, 03:24 AM
> also out is firefox 0.9,
Mmmm...must get FireFox 0.9.
<P ID="signature">http:\\www.xanga.com\ZeldaDDhttp://www.angelfire.com/realm2/zdd2/images/For_Me.txt</a></P>
Narvick
06-19-2004, 07:15 AM
Yup, I downloaded the latest Firefox and Thunderbird.
<P ID="signature">:D!</P>
Kuikorosu
06-19-2004, 09:11 AM
> Dude, I agree with Cipher. The name is not important. What's
> important is the PRODUCT.
I'm not a fan of firefox for many a reason. One of which is that ugly awful download manager, secondly, yeah, the name does turn me off. Firefox sounds like some furry's pseudonym. Thirdly, I just don't see the advantage of firefox over bird in later releases. I haven't thought to myself, "gee, if only my browser did this" and I figure, why fix something that isn't broken?
<P ID="signature"><hr>
Name: Kuik
Level: 34BLM /20RDM / 15THF /9NIN/ 8WHM / 8SAM
Nation: Windurst
Server: Fenrir</p>
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.